[EF! Newswire note: The politics behind this story are tricky. We suggest reading more background on recent mining struggles to get a clearer picture of the context in which these protests have occurred.]
A Shipibo man was one of three people killed March 14 in Puerto Maldonado, in Peru’s southeastern Amazon region, during a protest against new laws designed to control wildcat gold mining in the country’s Madre de Dios region.
Francisco Areque, 38, of the San José de Karene community in the Manú province, died shortly after 1 p.m. on March 14. Reports said he was shot, but his brother, Marco Areque, said that the official autopsy report was inconclusive.
Marco Areque said his brother’s widow, Natalia Omnia, a Harakmbut, told him she and her husband were sitting with a group of demonstrators in a town square when about 20 police approached. The group scattered, and when Francisco turned around, he was struck in the face and collapsed.
He was to be buried March 15.
Ten communities belonging to the Native Federation of the Madre de Dios River and its Tributaries (Federación Nativa del Río Madre de Dios y Afluentes, FENAMAD) are participating in the protests. The demonstrations began March 5, shutting down commerce in Puerto Maldonado, and became violent after talks with government officials broke down on March 12.
Officials estimated that between 10,000 and 15,000 miners had joined the protests in Puerto Maldonado by March 14, when protesters tried to take over the airport and the main market. Eyewitnesses reported hearing gunfire.
The miners oppose a series of new laws designed to crack down on “informal” mining – claims where the miners lack authorization from environmental authorities and generally fail to comply with labor, occupational safety and health, and environmental standards. The new decrees make mining without proper authorization a criminal offense punishable by a prison term.
They also define an area, generally along the Madre de Dios River, where mining would be permitted, and prohibit it in other areas, especially the buffer zone of the Tambopata Natural Reserve, where thousands of miners began working last year.
FENAMAD representatives participating in talks with miners’ associations and government officials on March 12 stayed at the table even after the miners walked out, but then rejoined the protest. The group is seeking a special exemption that would allow communities to mine gold on their own lands.
To read full article go to source as cross-posted from here
hey – this sucks BIG TIME. so, the EarthFirst! newswire is starting to shift its focus towards the rights of resource extraction?
believe me, i know all too well how difficult it can be to become involved in issues like this, wherein poor people’s efforts to earn some sort of meager income collide with the rights of indigenous peoples and the existence of functioning ecosystems. that doesn’t justify speaking up for the rights of people to destroy ecosystems that still provide for the needs of all the critters and other living things – including people.
i’m not trying to excuse or justify the atrocity committed by the peruvian military, but standing up for the rights of mining interests is not EarthFirst’s mission.
acquiring gold/wealth at all costs is actually against everything forest, earth and animal defenders have fought, suffered and died for, over generations.
please be more thoughtful about how you approach such issues. i’m sure you could have found something on the internet about indigenous communities who oppose illegal mining on lands their people rely upon for their sustenance. the internet’s great that way. that’s why the government wants to take it away from us – it makes it too easy for us to find common ground with one another, wherever we may be, no matter what our interests are.
yours for a wild, free planet, including humanity.
Yes, thank you for your response. There are several people affiliated with the Earth First! Journal who post through this newswire, and we are looking into who re-posted this story and why. It seems that there is more to this story. What interests do multinational gold companies have in the re-writing of these laws? As an editor of the Journal and Newswire, I agree with you that the Earth First! movement should not be perceived as advocating for gold mining, and i also speculate that there may be more to the story that is not told in this unfortunate re-post. Anyone care to assist in further research on this? —one EF! Journal collective member